Making Your Writing “Sing” Like the Beatles

From Jeff: This is a guest post by Mike Loomis. Mike is a writer and Senior Team Leader with Vaughn Street. You can follow him on Twitter: @MikeLoomis

I’m no songwriter, but I remember when I first discovered the Beatles. After listening a few times, I could hum the tune and was instantly hooked. Why was this?

What made John, Paul, George, and Ringo so epic?

The same answer is true for what makes a good writer.

The Beatles

Photo credit: Andy Doyle (Creative Commons)

Eventually, I realized why their songs were so catchy. Ninety-nine percent of The Beatles’ songs have the same structure:

Verse / Verse / Chorus / Verse / Bridge / Chorus / End

As it turns out, we can learn a lot about written communication from a good pop song.

A Hit Single

I’m not talking about books here. Creating The White Album is another story. This is about crafting short blurbs that earn you the privilege of having your other works read.

In other words, if I like your “single,” I will check out your “album.”

Years ago, on a sabbatical from consulting, I took a position at a church where I was in charge of communications.

As the church grew, I personally emailed about a hundred people each week. Many of these emails contained a request for an investment of time, so getting a “yes” from volunteers was extremely important.

The people you communicate with are no different.

They have options and don’t need to invest time reading your work. So what will you do to get their attention?

No Reply

If the subject line of the email wasn’t compelling, it would never get opened. If the first sentence wasn’t interesting, the it would never be read. If it wasn’t catchy, I’d get no response.

Getting a “yes” with your writing is important. It’s the secret to writing a winning book proposal or sending a compelling newsletter. And it requires the same elements of crafting a great song.

After someone has read your article or appeal, what’s their takeaway?

Unforgettable pieces of work don’t leave this to chance. They give people a reason to care and clear language to share the message with others.

Hello, Goodbye

Think about the emails and letters you hate to open — and have stopped opening. Long, random, with multiple topics and no clear call-to-action.

Now, look at the last few emails you sent. Were they a work of art?

This applies to more than email.

How about your blog? Or the last magazine article you wrote? Can a website get inside your head? Is your brand a timeless ballad, a great song with a hook?

The Long and Winding Road

Whether you write five or five hundred words, you should be crafting a message that is unforgettable. Improvisation is good, but the more a musician practices the fundamentals, the better they are at spontaneity.

So how do we do this? We practice.

Here are some basic elements to make your message sing:

  • A fresh introduction
  • Engaging tone and personality
  • A simple message that builds
  • One main idea that sticks with you
  • A clear purpose or call-to-action

Think about all the ways you introduce your ideas to the world. Are you singing a song that others will recognize? Are you taking chances by being fresh, honest and bold?

What do you want people to remember about you?  Sing that.

*Photo credit: Andy Doyle (Creative Commons)

About the Author

Jeff Goins

I help people tell better stories and make a difference in the world. I live in Tennessee with my wife and dog. Follow me on Twitter and Facebook.

  • http://www.eileenknowles.blogspot.com Eileen

    Somehow…I just knew this post was going to end with…practice.  That seems to be the solution to reaching so many goals. :)   Thanks.  Good thoughts. 

    • Mike Loomis

      Thank you, Eileen!  I know what you mean about practice. But as with music, practice CAN  be fun. Especially with feedback!

  • http://blog.cyberquill.com Cyberquill

    Good advice, but when people visit my blog, I want them to be so bored with my writing that they click on the ads just to get away, and then I simply sit back and wait for my AdSense and affiliate earnings to roll in. (The only problem with my strategy is the relative dearth of return visitors.)

  • Lia London

    I agree that musicality in writing speaks to many, whether or not they are consciously aware of the rhythm and form.  When I’m writing, I find it difficult to resist a sort of refrain/chorus feeling.    It just feels natural.

    • Mike Loomis

      Me too, Lia. I’m hoping it happens more and more naturally in my work.  Thanks!

      • Lia London

        In keeping with the music idea, in the 20th century, composers kept trying to be so new that they took much of the ear-pleasing quality out of music.  It became strident, atonal, arhythmic.  And it just doesn’t seem to have the sticking power of  more tried and tested “variations on a theme” methods of classic composers.  Pop musicians know what Bach, Mozart and Handel know.  You gotta make it catchy, even while making it beautiful and rich.

        Writing can definitely be the same way.

        • Mike Loomis

          Wow – I’ve never heard that critique of “trying to be so new they took out ear-pleasing qualities”.  (probably because I’m a drummer…)   But I think you’re on to something.  The songs that rise to the surface are simply beautiful – regardless of genre. Thank you!

  • http://thepaperskies.com David Helms

    At the same time, if you are writing just to get readers then you are just tickling ears.  If you are writing to make a difference and change lives then you have to be more challenging and the average “web-surfer” won’t take time to read.  The difficulty is you won’t make a difference to someone if they never read it.  The ‘ol catch 22.

    • Mike Loomis

      Thanks, David. Catch 22 indeed.  Can we be interesting AND challenging?  Yes – that’s art, right?  

      • http://thepaperskies.com David Helms

        that, indeed, is art.

  • http://thecormierfamily.org/Jason/ Jason

    Right on post.  All the best writers have a set flow to their writing. 

  • Anonymous

    Great analogy, Mike. I like the parallels you point out with writing. Everyone has their “Introducing The Beatles” phase, but even they didn’t stop after “Sgt. Pepper”. They went on to constantly improve themselves, but for themselves, not for record sales or notoriety.

    That enabled them to go on to “Abbey Road”. Then to the “White Album”. And they fed off of each other’s strong points, and left their weaknesses outside the studio (at least until “Let It Be”).

    Thanks for this piece on your comparisons with our writing and the Fab Four’s. We need to keep focusing on our full potential as they did. The world would be a far different place if they leveled off at “Love Me Do”. Practice may not really make ‘perfect’, but it certainly makes ‘better’ moving forward.

    • http://goinswriter.com/ Jeff Goins

      Amen

    • Mike Loomis

      Well said!

  • http://peterpaluska.com Peter Paluska

    Fine concept post, Mike! I love it. Yes, the Beatles were the masters of the catchy pop tune.

    But how about Elvis Costello – he takes it to the next level. With “The Angels Want to Wear My Red Shoes”, Elvis performs 4 or so extremely catchy and infectious verses and saves the chorus for the very end. It’s sort of like eating a delicious meal topped off with a mouthwatering dessert.

    • Mike Loomis

      Tension… and…

      …release.

      Yes!

  • http://www.distractedbyprayer.blogspot.com Shannon

    After reading your article, I think I’ve synthesized my message:

    You can pray.  Right now.

    That’s the chorus of my blog posts from now on.  The verses will change things up a little.
    Thanks for the inspiration!

  • Matt

    Hey Jeff,

    That’s a good analogy :) From what I know, the beatles had the opportunity to perform for an incredible amount of hours early on… so they honed their skills, developed themselves to a high level of mastery.

    So that would explain the epic part ;)

    Matt

    • http://goinswriter.com/ Jeff Goins

      Interesting. All about practice!

  • http://jamsmooth.com Jamsmooth

    You hooked me with having The Beatles in your subject line! I’m a huge fan. Have you checked out the new documentary by Martin Scorcese on George Harrison? It’s outstanding. 

    There is a subtext in this post and it’s detailed in Malcolm Galdwell’s book, “Outliers.” The Beatles had played 1,200 shows before they stepped foot in America. They played 8 hours a day in Hamburg at a strip club. In other words, they practiced, a lot. 

    They were so experienced in their craft it was second nature. I think they were able to remove a lot of guess work from their process which ultimately allowed them to do so much experimentation. 

    Look at writers like Tom Wolfe. He’s one of my favorite authors and he’s written in so many different voices. Wolfe’s experience enables him to focus on the content, not the mechanics. 

    So while you advocate a formulaic approach to writing, which I think is a great suggestion. Practice is the underlying tenant that will give your writing power and impact. 

    • Mike Loomis

      Glad you liked the post! Yeah, from what I’ve heard, those guys were making amazing music in the Cavern, long before they were on TV.

      Gotta give credit where it’s due – Jeff encouraged me and helped with this post – and was the brains behind putting “Beatles” in the title. Brilliant.

  • Anonymous

    I. Love. This. Post. :)